ArticlePloS one2024
The impact of wearing compression hosiery and the use of assistive products for donning and doffing: A descriptive qualitative study into user experiences.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Portable, Active Abdominal Compression Binder for Orthostatic Intolerance: Design and Evaluation in Healthy Subjects.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This qualitative study aimed to describe users' experiences and needs related to wearing, donning, and doffing compression hosiery, and the provision process of compression hosiery and associated assistive products for donning and doffing. Adults who have been advised to wear compression hosiery participated in semi-structured interviews. Existing frameworks about the provision process and acceptance of assistive technology guided the topic list. The interviews were analyzed using directed content analysis. After 19 interviews, data saturation was reached. Three main themes were revealed: (1) becoming and being a compression hosiery wearer (or not), (2) wearing compression hosiery, and (3) donning and doffing compression hosiery. In cases of acute conditions, the participants reported feeling overwhelmed when they were first prescribed compression hosiery. In contrast, those with long-term complaints felt relieved. Participants considered advantages and disadvantages and then decided whether to wear compression hosiery. Despite mentioned beneficial effects from wearing compression hosiery, participants had to cope with a range of discomforts, including pinching, straining, sagging, and heat. Additionally, participants had difficulties with the appearance, and often tried to hide the compression hosiery. They mentioned problems with donning and doffing, which can result in dependency of home or informal care, which stopped some participants from wearing. In general, participants were not aware of the full range of assistive products for donning and doffing, but were interested in them. In conclusion, wearing compression hosiery has a large impact on a person's life because of its lack of comfort, unattractive appearance, and possible loss of independence through the need of donning and doffing support. These are expressed reasons for non-adherence, in addition to a lack of understanding of the importance of wearing and the consequences of not wearing compression hosiery. Easy-to-find independent information and more attention to donning and doffing during the fitting appointment of compression hosiery are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.