ArticlePloS one2024
Longer-term consequences of increased body checking in women at risk for eating disorders-a naturalistic experimental online study.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Body checking is a common behavior in both the general population and individuals with body image disturbances. Cognitive-behavioral theories postulate that body checking reduces negative emotions in the short term, but over time contributes to the development and maintenance of eating disorder pathology. So far, few experimental studies have assessed these longer-term consequences, mostly under laboratory conditions, yielding inconsistent findings, and without considering individual vulnerability and specific personality traits. In a naturalistic experimental cross-over design, women with low (n = 76) vs. high (n = 103) body concern completed an online survey on trait characteristics (e.g., intolerance of uncertainty). After a two-day baseline to assess the daily amount of habitual body checking, participants underwent two three-day experimental conditions in randomized order, in which they were asked to exhibit typical vs. threefold increased body checking. Before and after conditions, participants completed state measures of eating disorder symptoms, body dissatisfaction, affect, and general pathology online. In women with high body concern, body image-related symptoms (i.e., drive for thinness, body dissatisfaction) and negative affect worsened in the increased body checking condition, whereas in the typical body checking condition, positive affect increased and no negative impact emerged. Conversely, women with low body concern remained unaffected, except for higher drive for thinness following the increased condition. Bulimic and depressive symptoms did not change in either group. The inclusion of intolerance of uncertainty from an exploratory perspective generally did not impact the results. Our findings regarding the high-risk group underscore the potential etiological relevance of body checking for body image disturbances and eating disorders. For individuals at risk and those already affected by eating disorders, it seems important to address individual body checking as early as possible within psychoeducation to prevent a presumably harmful increase in this behavior. Personality factors influencing vulnerability to body checking need to be further examined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.