ArticlePloS one2024
An alternative Semi-Autotropic Hydroponics (SAH) substrate for cassava rapid propagation: A first study case.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Curcumin-rich plant material production through a robust and reproducible micropropagation protocol.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Advances and prospects of genomic-assisted breeding in roots, tubers, and banana crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The expansion of Semi-Autotrophic Hydroponics technology to address the issue of multiplying and disseminating virus-free planting materials for vegetatively propagated crops is challenged by the utilization of imported substrate, namely, KlasmannTS3. In this study, we evaluated the growth parameters and cutting production of cassava genotypes during three subsequent plantlet production cycles using three single substrates, namely, KlasmannTS3 (K), vermiculite (V), and local peat (P), and three blended substrates. The blended substrates were a combination of 25% K and 75% P (K25P75), a combination of V and P at respective rates of 25% and 75% (V25P75), and respective rates of 10% and 90% (V10P90). All cuttings obtained in one plantlet production cycle were transplanted into the next. The multiplication rate of cutting from cycle 1 to 2 (R1) and cycle 2 to 3 (R2) was calculated as the ratios of the number of cuttings per the number of plantlets in each cycle. K and K25P75 led to similar R1 and R2, except with the genotype IBA961089A, where K25P75 led to a higher R1. Local peat and V solely showed similar cutting multiplication rates, and were lower than V25P75 and V10P90. Substrates with a higher cutting production also led to a higher plantlet height, leaf, and internode number. V and its combinations with local peat led to the densest plantlet root system. The performance of the substrates contrasted among the genotypes, but IBA961089A mostly outperformed the two other genotypes. We concluded that up to 75% of K and, to a lesser extent 75% of V, can be substituted by P without compromising cutting production. V and P should be combined instead of being used separately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.