ReviewArchives of toxicology2025
Drug protection against radiation-induced neurological injury: mechanisms and developments.
Review in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inducing radiation resilience in frozen animal cells via mRNA coding for tardigrade damage-suppressor protein in support of space travel and Lunar storage.The Journal of heredity · 2026Article
- 2R,3R-trans-Dihydroquercetin Has Powerful Antioxidant Properties, Prevents DNA and Protein Damage, and Protects Mice from Injury Caused by Radiation-Induced Oxidative Stress.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Isoliquiritigenin as a Neuronal Radiation Mitigant: Mitigating Radiation-Induced Anhedonia Tendency Targeting Grik3/Grm8/Grin3a via Integrated Proteomics and AI-Driven Discovery.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In daily life, individuals are frequently exposed to various forms of radiation, which, when adhering to safety standards, typically result in relatively minor health effects. However, accidental exposure to radiation levels that exceed these safety standards can lead to significant health consequences. This study focuses on the analysis of radiation-induced damage to the nervous system and the mechanisms of pharmacological protection. The findings indicate that radiation can adversely affect neural structures, memory, and neurobehaviour. A range of pharmacological agents, including traditional Chinese medicine, Western medicine, and other therapeutic drugs, can be employed to safeguard the nervous system from radiation damage. The primary protective mechanisms of these agents encompass antioxidant effects, attenuation of apoptosis, and reduction of neurogenesis. A comprehensive review of these topics will offer new insights for the development and investigation of drugs aimed at mitigating radiation-induced damage to the nervous system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39724149What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.