Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39724141›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Machine learning-based pipeline for automated intracerebral hemorrhage and drain detection, quantification, and classification in non-enhanced CT images (NeuroDrAIn).

Samer Elsheikh, Ahmed Elbaz, Alexander Rau, Theo Demerath, Elias Kellner, Ralf Watzlawick, Urs Würtemberger, Horst Urbach, Marco Reisert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Samer ElsheikhDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3796-5709
Ahmed ElbazDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Alexander RauDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5881-6043
Theo DemerathDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Elias KellnerMedical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Ralf WatzlawickDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Urs WürtembergerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Horst UrbachDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Marco ReisertMedical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeExternal drainage represents a well-established treatment option for acute intracerebral hemorrhage. The current standard of practice includes post-operative computer tomography imaging, which is subjectively evaluated. The implementation of an objective, automated evaluation of postoperative studies may enhance diagnostic accuracy and facilitate the scaling of research projects. The objective is to develop and validate a fully automated pipeline for intracerebral hemorrhage and drain detection, quantification of intracerebral hemorrhage coverage, and detection of malpositioned drains. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective study, we selected patients (n = 68) suffering from supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage treated by minimally invasive surgery, from years 2010-2018. These were divided into training (n = 21), validation (n = 3) and testing (n = 44) datasets. Mean age (SD) was 70 (±13.56) years, 32 female. Intracerebral hemorrhage and drains were automatically segmented using a previously published artificial intelligence-based approach. From this, we calculated coverage profiles of the correctly detected drains to quantify the drains' coverage by the intracerebral hemorrhage and classify malpositioning. We used accuracy measures to assess detection and classification results and intraclass correlation coefficient to assess the quantification of the drain coverage by the intracerebral hemorrhage.

resultsIn the test dataset, the pipeline showed a drain detection accuracy of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.99), an agreement between predicted and ground truth coverage profiles of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.85 to 0.87) and a drain position classification accuracy of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.77 to 0.95) resulting in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85 to 0.99).

conclusionWe developed and statistically validated an automated pipeline for evaluating computed tomography scans after minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage. The algorithm reliably detects drains, quantifies drain coverage by the hemorrhage, and uses machine learning to detect malpositioned drains. This pipeline has the potential to impact the daily clinical workload, as well as to facilitate the scaling of data collection for future research into intracerebral hemorrhage and other diseases.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageDrainageMachine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39724141
PMCPMC11670976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.