Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39724020›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Photobiomodulation as part of multimodal analgesia to improve pain relief and wound healing after elective caesarean section: A protocol for randomized controlled trial.

Maram Khaled, Adriana Baranov, Alvaro Diaz, Mansi Patel, Sarah Clements, Parsa Farsinejad, Kabir Khatana, Ashmitha Gnanapragasam, Sathurthika Selvanayagam, Zeineb Muhsen and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05738239 (Application of Photo-biomodulation as Part of Multimodal Analgesia to Improve Pain Relief and Wound Healing for Patients Having Elective Caesarean Section), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05738239 nacompletednot on this map

Application of Photo-biomodulation as Part of Multimodal Analgesia to Improve Pain Relief and Wound Healing for Patients Having Elective Caesarean Section: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled180ConditionsPainArmsLaser therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Maram KhaledDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1200-1388
Adriana BaranovDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Alvaro DiazDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Mansi PatelDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7917-8666
Sarah ClementsDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Parsa FarsinejadDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3305-4649
Kabir KhatanaDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ashmitha GnanapragasamDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-7872-167X
Sathurthika SelvanayagamDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9509-8028
Zeineb MuhsenMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-4305-639X
Jocelyn ChanMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sanjum HunjanMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ayman KaziDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4685-1911
Sapna SharmaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lea LuketicDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Joycelyne Efua EwusieDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel CordovaniDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Harsha ShanthannaDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4105-4465

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaesarean section (CS) is the most common inpatient surgical procedure performed in Canada. CS is known to cause moderate-to-severe pain, which is suggested to be associated with postpartum depression and persistent pain. Existing limitations in multimodal analgesia and conscious attempts to avoid opioids highlight the need for non-pharmacological strategies. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) uses light-emitting diode (LED) and laser and has suggested potential for improving pain control and wound healing. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of PBMT as part of existing multimodal analgesia after elective CSs.

methodsThis placebo-controlled, two-arm, multi-centre, parallel-design randomized controlled trial includes women aged ≥16 years with planned CS under spinal anesthesia (Clinical Trials Registration: NCT05738239). Patients will be randomized post-CS to intervention (n = 90) or placebo (n = 90). Study interventions will be carried out using equipment supported by Meditech International Incorporated (approved by Health Canada for pain relief). Patients will receive a maximum of 5 post-surgical treatment sessions of active PBMT (intervention: LED therapy: DUO 240 [red at 660nm and near-infrared at 840nm] applied parallel to the abdominal incision scar, followed by BIOFLEX LDR-100 laser probe (660nm red light) and the LD1-200 laser probe (825nm near-infrared light), applied at the incision wound edges) or non-effective doses of LED array and laser therapy (placebo), 4-6 hrs post-CS, and at 8am and 7pm of postoperative days 1 and 2. Patients, research assistants involved in patient recruitment and follow-up, health care providers, and data analysts will be blinded. All patients will have access to routine multimodal analgesia. Patients will be followed up in hospital on the evening of surgery and on postoperative days 1 and 2 (morning, noon, and evening); at 6 weeks; and at 3 months by telephone. Primary outcome is pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain). SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study may result in improved pain control, maternal satisfaction and wound healing; decrease the use of perioperative opioids; potentially decrease the incidence of postpartum depression and persistent pain; and overall lead to better postoperative outcomes thereby decreasing healthcare costs.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionLow-Level Light TherapyPain ManagementPostoperative PainWound HealingAdultAnalgesiaCanadaElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPain MeasurementPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID39724020
PMCPMC11670968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.