Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39724002›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2024

A Community-Engaged, Mixed-Methods Approach to Prioritizing Needs in a Statewide Assessment of Community Cancer Needs.

Jessica R Thompson, Todd Burus, Caree McAfee, Christine Stroebel, Madeline Brown, Keeghan Francis, Melinda Rogers, Jennifer Knight, Elaine Russell, Connie Sorrell and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jessica R ThompsonCommunity Impact Office, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Todd BurusCommunity Impact Office, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Caree McAfeeCommunity Impact Office, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Christine StroebelCommunity Impact Office, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Madeline BrownCommunity Impact Office, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Keeghan FrancisCommunity Impact Office, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Melinda RogersKentucky Cancer Program, Community Impact Office, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Jennifer KnightDepartment of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Elaine RussellKentucky Cancer Consortium, Community Impact Office, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Connie SorrellKentucky Cancer Program, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
Elizabeth WestbrookKentucky Cancer Program, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
Pamela C HullCommunity Impact Office, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington.

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Jennifer F Rogers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Kentucky has the highest all-site cancer incidence and death rate in the US. In 2021, the University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center convened a steering committee to conduct a statewide community cancer needs assessment (CNA). The goal of the final CNA phase was to gather community input on prioritizing Kentucky's cancer-related needs and ways to address them. Methods: In 2021, we recruited 162 people to participate in online concept mapping, a participatory mixed method, to explore connections and identify priority areas. Fifty-one community members and 111 organizational partners participated in survey-based activities to prioritize 80 items representing key CNA findings and discussion groups to explore key focus areas and strategies for Kentucky communities. Results: Concept maps display perceived similarity of the 80 items and a 6-cluster solution. High-priority focus areas included lung cancer screening, smoking, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, and disparities driven by social determinants among rural, Appalachian, Black, and Hispanic residents. High-priority strategies to address needs included expanding health communication on risks, screening guidelines, and insurance benefits; patient navigation; accessible, culturally appropriate treatment information and self-efficacy in treatment decisions; access to care through financial assistance, mobile clinics, and at-home screening; and patient-provider trust and communication. Conclusion: Our findings indicate the utility of the concept mapping process to facilitate the prioritization of wide-ranging catchment area needs and ways to address them. Moving forward, the prioritized focus areas and strategies can inform Kentucky's new state cancer plan and future research to reduce the state's cancer burden and disparities.

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentNeoplasmsFemaleHumansKentuckyMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39724002
PMCPMC11675799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.