ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2025
An in silico framework to visualize how cancer-associated mutations influence structural plasticity of the chemokine receptor CCR3.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An in silico framework to visualize how cancer-associated mutations influence structural plasticity of the chemokine receptor CCR3.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
G protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell surface receptors in humans. Somatic mutations in GPCRs are implicated in cancer progression and metastasis, but mechanisms are poorly understood. Emerging evidence implicates perturbation of intra-receptor activation pathway motifs whereby extracellular signals are transmitted intracellularly. Recently, sufficiently sensitive methodology was described to calculate structural strain as a function of missense mutations in AlphaFold-predicted model structures, which was extensively validated on experimental and predicted structural datasets. When paired with Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations, these tools provide a facile approach to screen mutations in silico. We applied this framework to calculate the structural and dynamic effects of cancer-associated mutations in the chemokine receptor CCR3, a Class A GPCR involved in cancer and autoimmune disorders. Residue-residue contact scoring refined effective strain results, highlighting significant remodeling of inter- and intra-motif contacts along the highly conserved GPCR activation pathway network. We then integrated AlphaFold-derived predicted Local Distance Difference Test scores with per-residue Root Mean Square Fluctuations and activation pathway Contact Analysis (CONAN) from coarse grain MD simulations to identify statistically significant changes in receptor dynamics upon mutation. Finally, analysis of negative control mutants suggests false positive results in AlphaFold pipelines should be considered but can be mitigated with stricter control of statistical analysis. Our results indicate selected mutants influence structural plasticity of CCR3 related to ligand interaction, activation, and G protein coupling, using a framework that could be applicable to a wide range of biochemically relevant protein targets following further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.