Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39723817›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2025

Untrimmed ITS2 metabarcode sequences cause artificially reduced abundances of specific fungal taxa.

Kathleen E Kyle, Jonathan L Klassen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kathleen E KyleDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2837-1124
Jonathan L KlassenDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1745-8838

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) IOS-1656475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in DNA metabarcoding have greatly expanded our knowledge of microbial communities in recent years. Pipelines and parameters have been tested extensively for bacterial metabarcoding using the 16S rRNA gene and best practices are largely established. For fungal metabarcoding using the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) gene, however, only a few studies have considered how such pipelines and parameters can affect community prediction. Here, we report a novel bias uncovered during ITS region 2 (ITS2) sequencing of IMPORTANCE: Metabarcode sequencing produces DNA abundance profiles that are presumed to reflect the actual microbial composition of their corresponding input samples. However, this assumption is not always tested, and taxon-specific biases are often not apparent, especially for low-abundance taxa in complex communities. Here, we identified internal transcribed spacer region 2 (ITS2) read quality aberrations that caused dramatic reductions in the relative abundances of specific taxa in multiple data sets characterizing ant fungus gardens. Such taxon-specific biases in read quality may be widespread in other environments and for other fungal taxa, thereby causing incorrect descriptions of these mycobiomes.

Indexed as

AntsDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFungiMycobiomeTrichodermaAnimalsDNA, FungalSequence Analysis, DNADNA, FungalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerbioinformaticsfungiITS2metabarcodingTrichodermatrimming

Identifiers

PMID39723817
PMCPMC11784184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.