Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39723682›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2024

Preferred fixation position and gaze location: Two factors modulating the composite face effect.

Puneeth N Chakravarthula, Ansh K Soni, Miguel P Eckstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Puneeth N ChakravarthulaDepartment of Psychological and Brain Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Ansh K SoniDepartment of Psychological and Brain Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Miguel P EcksteinDepartment of Psychological and Brain Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.

Funding

Foveated Search Model for Real World ScenesR21EY036488 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI ECKSTEIN, MIGUEL PATRICIO · 2024 to 2025
$275k
NEI NIH HHS R21 EY036488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans consistently land their first saccade to a face at a preferred fixation location (PFL). Humans also typically process faces as wholes, as evidenced by perceptual effects such as the composite face effect (CFE). However, not known is whether an individual's tendency to process faces as wholes varies with their gaze patterns on the face. Here, we investigated variation of the CFE with the PFL. We compared the strength of the CFE for two groups of observers who were screened to have their PFLs either higher up, closer to the eyes, or lower on the face, closer to the tip of the nose. During the task, observers maintained their gaze at either their own group's mean PFL or at the other group's mean PFL. We found that the top half of the face elicits a stronger CFE than the bottom half. Further, the strength of the CFE was modulated by the distance of the PFL from the eyes, such that individuals with a PFL closer to the eyes had a stronger CFE than those with a PFL closer to the mouth. Finally, the top-half CFE for both upper-lookers and lower-lookers was abolished when they fixated at a non-preferred location on the face. Our findings show that the CFE relies on internal face representations shaped by the long-term use of a consistent oculomotor strategy to view faces.

Indexed as

Fixation, OcularSaccadesAdultFaceFacial RecognitionFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39723682
PMCPMC11681917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.