Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39723604›Full record

ArticleAllergy2025

Identification of Gut Biomarkers of FPIES in a Longitudinal Comparative Pediatric Study.

A Lemoine, N Kapel, I Nicolis, P Tounian, A Bruneau, N Kapandji, K Adel-Patient, M Thomas

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A LemoineFaculté de Santé, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8443-7207
N KapelFHU-PaCeMM (Paris Center for Microbiome Medicine), Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2068-9015
I NicolisUR 7537 BioSTM, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7207-7689
P TounianFaculté de Santé, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5976-2240
A BruneauINRAE, Micalis Institute, UMR1319, AgroParisTech, Paris Saclay University, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8068-1041
N KapandjiINRAE, Micalis Institute, UMR1319, AgroParisTech, Paris Saclay University, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3350-3689
K Adel-PatientCEA, INRAE, DMTS, LIAA, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2242-0626
M ThomasINRAE, Micalis Institute, UMR1319, AgroParisTech, Paris Saclay University, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7608-3274

Funding

Société Française d'AllergologieSociété Française de PédiatrieSociété Francophone Nutrition Clinique et MétabolismeSociété Nationale Française de Gastro-EntérologieSodilacSoredab
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated allergy without known biomarkers. We aimed to compare fecal biomarkers related to gut inflammation and immunity in children with FPIES, with resolved FPIES (tolerant), and in matched controls.

methodsStools were collected from FPIES children on elimination diet, before and after an oral food challenge (OFC) performed to assess their natural tolerance, at the end of a follow-up in tolerant FPIES children, and in matched controls (1:1 ratio). Concentrations of calprotectin, EDN (eosinophilic derived neurotoxin), and secretory IgA (sIgA) underwent comparative paired analysis.

resultsThirty-eight patients were included (age: 1.3 years old, interquartile range: IQR [0.9-2.0]), of which 22 became tolerant during follow-up. Upon inclusion, allergic patients and controls had similar concentrations of calprotectin (38 μg/g [8-85] vs. 27 μg/g [11-46], p = 0.15) and EDN (504 ng/g [275-1252] vs. 516 ng/g [215-844], p = 0.86). However, concentrations of these inflammatory biomarkers increased transiently after a failed OFC (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01 respectively), without correlating with the severity of an allergic reaction. sIgA were higher in allergic than in tolerant patients: 2224 μg/g [878-3529] vs. 794 μg/g [699-1767] (p < 0.01). Calprotectin, EDN, and sIgA were comparable in tolerant patients and controls. sIgA less than 2637 μg/g had a negative predictive value of 75.3% for the differentiation allergic patients from tolerant patients and controls (area under curve: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.52-0.74).

conclusionA few days after an acute allergic reaction, there was no detectable chronic gut inflammation in FPIES. sIgA may be a useful tool for clinicians in timing OFC.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDietary ProteinsEnterocolitisFood HypersensitivityChildChild, PreschoolEosinophil-Derived NeurotoxinFecesFemaleHumansInfantLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexLongitudinal StudiesMaleBiomarkersDietary ProteinsEosinophil-Derived NeurotoxinLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexcalprotectinEDNFPIESIgAzonulin

Identifiers

PMID39723604
PMCPMC12105057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.