Article in Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Christel Ferréol AzonGenetics, Biotechnology and Seed Science Unit (GBioS), Laboratory of Crop Production, Physiology and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences University of Abomey-Calavi Cotonou Republic of Benin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2560-4816
Nicodème V Fassinou HotegniGenetics, Biotechnology and Seed Science Unit (GBioS), Laboratory of Crop Production, Physiology and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences University of Abomey-Calavi Cotonou Republic of Benin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5826-3688
Charlotte O AdjéGenetics, Biotechnology and Seed Science Unit (GBioS), Laboratory of Crop Production, Physiology and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences University of Abomey-Calavi Cotonou Republic of Benin.
Lewis Spencer GnanglèGenetics, Biotechnology and Seed Science Unit (GBioS), Laboratory of Crop Production, Physiology and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences University of Abomey-Calavi Cotonou Republic of Benin.
Evelyn BenjaminDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science Ebonyi State University Abakaliki Nigeria.
Ruvarashe Loveness MhuruyengweDepartment of Crop Science University of Zimbabwe Harare Zimbabwe.
Abdou Mouizz SalaouGenetics, Biotechnology and Seed Science Unit (GBioS), Laboratory of Crop Production, Physiology and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences University of Abomey-Calavi Cotonou Republic of Benin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2379-6646
Aristide Carlos HoudegbeGenetics, Biotechnology and Seed Science Unit (GBioS), Laboratory of Crop Production, Physiology and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences University of Abomey-Calavi Cotonou Republic of Benin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3774-5658
Deedi Olga SogbohossouGenetics, Biotechnology and Seed Science Unit (GBioS), Laboratory of Crop Production, Physiology and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences University of Abomey-Calavi Cotonou Republic of Benin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9034-0062
Paulin SedahGenetics, Biotechnology and Seed Science Unit (GBioS), Laboratory of Crop Production, Physiology and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences University of Abomey-Calavi Cotonou Republic of Benin.
Komivi DossaCIRAD, UMR AGAP Institut Montpellier France.
Clément AgbanglaLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Genome Analysis, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques University of Abomey-Calavi Cotonou Republic of Benin.
Florent J B QuenumGenetics, Biotechnology and Seed Science Unit (GBioS), Laboratory of Crop Production, Physiology and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences University of Abomey-Calavi Cotonou Republic of Benin.
Enoch G Achigan-DakoGenetics, Biotechnology and Seed Science Unit (GBioS), Laboratory of Crop Production, Physiology and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences University of Abomey-Calavi Cotonou Republic of Benin.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Sesame cultivation was until recently restricted to the northwestern part of Benin. The yield is relatively low, as there are no improved varieties introduced and widely adopted so far. This study aimed to assess the molecular diversity, genetic differentiation, and the agronomic performance of a collection of local cultivars and introduced lines of sesame from China. The agronomic evaluation was conducted across eight environments during the 2020 cropping season using 14 descriptors on 19 accessions, including 6 introduced lines arranged in a randomized complete bloc design. Twelve simple sequence repeat markers were used to assess the molecular diversity. The analysis of variance showed significant variation among accessions for all the traits, except the number of lodges per capsule. Principal component analysis (PCA) followed by hierarchical clustering indicated that the accessions could be classified into three groups. The first group included accessions from China with the local accession SI09, characterized by early flowering and low seed yields (on average 380.13 kg ha
Indexed as
agromorphological variationgenetic diversity and differentiationmolecular variationsesamesimple sequence repeat (SSR)
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Molecular Diversity and Agronomic Performance of Sesame ( · full record | OpenQuestion