ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Unveiling the hidden causal links: skin flora and cutaneous melanoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Chronic Infections as Catalysts for Melanoma Aggressiveness: Insights into Tumour Microenvironment Modulation.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Pooled it
- Immunological, Inflammatory, and Microbiota Determinants of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Evidence from Mendelian Randomization.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The presence of skin flora (SF) has been identified as a significant factor in the onset and progression of cutaneous melanoma (CM). However, the vast diversity and abundance of SF present challenges to fully understanding the causal relationship between SF and CM. Methods: A Two Sample Mendelian Randomization (TSMR) analysis was conducted to investigating the causal relationship between SF and CM. The Inverse-Variance Weighted (IVW) method was utilized as the primary approach to assess the causal relationship under investigation. Furthermore, an independent external cohort was employed to validate the initial findings, followed by a meta-analysis of the consolidated results. To address potential confounding factors related to the influence of SF on CM, a Multivariate Mendelian Randomization (MVMR) analysis was also conducted. Finally, a Reverse Mendelian Randomization (RMR) was conducted to further validate the causal association. Results: TSMR results showed that 9 SF have a causal relationship with CM in the training cohort. Although these 9 SF weren't confirmed in the testing cohort, 4 SF remained significant in the meta-analysis after integrating results from both cohorts. MVMR analysis indicated that 3 SF were still significantly associated with CM after accounting for the interactions between different SF in the training cohort. No reverse causal relationship was identified in RMR analysis. Conclusion: A total of 9 SF were identified as having a potential causal relationship with CM; however, a large randomized controlled trial is needed to verify these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.