Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39723342›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2024

Combination Treatment with Cryolipolysis and Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Jawline Enhancement.

Kumiko Shimojima, Mayuko Hashimoto, Yuhi Yamaoka, Krishan Mohan Kapoor

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06946550 (1470 nm Non-Ablative Laser for the Treatment of Scarring Alopecia), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06946550 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

1470 nm Non-Ablative Laser for the Treatment of Scarring Alopecia: A Clinical and Mechanistic Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontefiore Medical CenterRan2025 to 2027Enrolled5ConditionsScarring AlopeciaArms1470nm non-ablative fractional laser
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kumiko ShimojimaKumiko Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Mayuko HashimotoKumiko Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuhi YamaokaKumiko Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Krishan Mohan KapoorAnticlock Clinic, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3134-4266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Facial contouring procedures are increasingly sought to address aesthetic concerns such as submental fat accumulation and lack of jawline definition. Cryolipolysis and hyaluronic acid (HA) injection have emerged as promising modalities for lower face contouring, targeting fat reduction and jawline enhancement, respectively. Objective: This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of a combined treatment approach involving cryolipolysis followed by HA injection for addressing lower face contour concerns. Specifically, the study seeks to evaluate outcomes associated with this comprehensive treatment modality in the lower face region. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on four females and one male who underwent cryolipolysis treatment for double chin reduction, followed by HA injection for jawline contouring. Pre- and post-treatment assessments, including digital photographs and standardized measurements, were performed to evaluate changes in lower face contouring. Objective evaluation of treatment outcomes was facilitated using digital photographs and standardized measurements, including 3-D images captured using the VECTRA system. Post-treatment assessments were conducted at 4-week intervals to monitor progress, with participant satisfaction assessed using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at the end of six months after filler treatment. Results: Findings from this pilot study demonstrate significant improvement in lower face contouring resulting from the combined treatment of cryolipolysis and HA injection. Post-treatment improvements included reduced submental fullness, enhanced definition in the jawline and improved chin projection. The cervicomental angle, measured using VECTRA, demonstrated a reduction post-treatment in all subjects. After Cryolipolysis only, the mean change in cervicomental angle was -4.94°, with a p-value of 0.0635. After both cryolipolysis and fillers, the mean change in cervicomental angle was -9.34°, and the p-value was 0.0244, indicating a statistically significant reduction. Subjective reports from participants, using GAIS, indicated high satisfaction with treatment outcomes. Conclusion: These results indicate that while cryolipolysis alone shows a trend toward improvement, the addition of hyaluronic acid fillers provides a statistically significant enhancement in cervicomental angle and overall lower face contouring. Hence, integrating cryolipolysis and HA injections offers a comprehensive solution for addressing lower face contour concerns, providing synergistic benefits for both modalities.

Indexed as

chin fillerscryolipolysisfillershyaluronic acidjawline fillers

Identifiers

PMID39723342
PMCPMC11668967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.