ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating the Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI-Derived Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Density in Prostate Cancer Detection and its Association With Tumor Aggressiveness.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic accuracy of PSA derivatives for prostate cancer in patients with low prostate-specific antigen levels.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), calculated by dividing serum PSA levels by prostate volume, offers greater specificity and accuracy than serum PSA alone in detecting prostate cancer (PCa). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PSAD in PCa detection across different PSA levels and its correlation with Gleason scores. Methods This retrospective, single-center study reviewed data from 154 patients with suspected PCa who underwent prostate MRI between July 2021 and July 2023. Among these, 113 met the inclusion criteria, which required MRI-derived prostate volume measurements, serum PSA levels within three months of biopsy, and transperineal prostate biopsy results. PSAD was calculated by dividing serum PSA levels by prostate volume. Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA/SE 18.0 (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves identified optimal PSAD cutoff values for PCa detection, and the relationship between PSAD and Gleason scores was analyzed. Results Of the 113 patients, 72 (63.72%) were diagnosed with PCa. The overall PSAD cutoff of 0.158 demonstrated a sensitivity of 73.61% and specificity of 92.68%, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.90). For patients with PSA levels between 4-10 ng/ml, the optimal PSAD cutoff was 0.155 (sensitivity 65%, specificity 85.19%). For those with PSA levels >10 ng/ml, the cutoff was 0.175 (sensitivity 96.55%, specificity 66.67%). A significant correlation was found between PSAD and Gleason scores (p < 0.001), with higher PSAD values associated with more aggressive cancers. Conclusion PSAD demonstrates strong diagnostic accuracy for PCa and is significantly correlated with Gleason scores, suggesting its potential in assessing tumor aggressiveness and guiding clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.