ReviewCureus2024
Unlocking Team Potential: Mastering Communication in Palliative Care.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of the integrated rehabilitation-clinical-nutrition management model in geriatric rehabilitation patients: a narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- A new cross-disciplinary model for early integration of palliative care for patients with incurable cancer - an intervention development study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Integrating symptom science and precision health to enhance palliative care outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Palliative care in patients with brain metastases from breast cancer: a qualitative descriptive study of attitudes, practices, and barriers.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Healthcare Professionals Describe Difficulties Encountered When Breaking Bad News to Oncology Patients: An Italian Observational Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Perspectives of Patients on Communication and Involvement in Decision-Making during Palliative Care: A Qualitative Study in Rwanda.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2025Article
- How Palliative Care Clinicians Can Effectively Collaborate with Medical Interpreters to Improve Care for Patients Preferring a Language Other Than English.Palliative medicine reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective communication is crucial in multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) within palliative care, where patient needs can be complex and multifaceted. This article examines the significance of communication in promoting collaborative, patient-centered care while addressing challenges such as professional jargon, hierarchical barriers, and the emotional strain associated with end-of-life care. Leadership plays a vital role in creating an environment of open dialogue, reducing hierarchical dynamics, facilitating conflict resolution, and supporting the emotional well-being of team members. The article also outlines strategies to improve communication, including regular team meetings, the use of clear and inclusive language, communication skills training, and the integration of technology. By implementing these strategies, MDTs can overcome communication barriers, leading to better patient outcomes, enhanced team cohesion, and improved family satisfaction. In palliative settings, effective communication is essential for providing holistic and compassionate care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.