ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
A real-world pharmacovigilance study of neuroleptic malignant syndrome based on FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toxidromes.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Antidepressant Augmentation of Antipsychotic Treatment in Schizophrenia: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Review
- Risk factors for drug-related cachexia: an analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) from 2004 to 2025.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
- Safety assessment of Osilodrostat: The adverse event analysis based on FAERS database by means of disproportionality analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare but potentially life-threatening adverse drug reaction. This study aims to identify the most prevalent drugs associated with the risk of NMS according to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: Analyses were performed using data from the FAERS database from January 2004 to June 2024. Single-drug signals were evaluated using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), information component (IC), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM). Meanwhile, comparisons were performed with drug labels. Additionally, subgroup analysis was conducted, focusing on adverse drug reaction signals among populations of different genders and age groups. Results: A total of 10,433 adverse event reports related to NMS were identified, with the top 50 drugs ranked by ROR mainly involving antipsychotics (18, 36%), antiparkinson drugs (10, 20%), antidepressants (7, 14%), antiepileptics (3, 6%), anxiolytics (3, 6%), as well as hypnotics and sedatives (3, 6%). NMS is more prevalent in males (5,713, 54.76%). Among the top 20 drugs with the strongest signal strength, the pediatric group showed an additional presence of benzodiazepines and antiepileptic drugs compared to the adult group. Conclusion: The current comprehensive pharmacovigilance study identified more drugs associated with NMS and provides references to clinicians for clinical practice. Also, further research is needed to investigate the causal relationship between these drugs and NMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.