ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2025
Views on cervical cancer screening among female caregivers at the Uganda cancer Institute.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effects of Cancer Fear and Ruminative Thinking Styles on Attitudes Toward Cancer Screening Among Cancer Caregivers.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2026Article
- Caring for the caregivers: breast and cervical cancer screening among informal caregivers of cancer patients - a scoping review.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- A Qualitative Analysis of Factors Contributing to Cervical Cancer Screening Implementation in Health Care Facilities in Uganda.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients admitted to Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI) have their non-medical needs provided by caregivers called "attendants" who are predominantly female family members. This provides a unique opportunity to provide free screening among attendants during their free time at the hospital. The objective of this qualitative focus group study was to understand knowledge of and facilitators and barriers to cervical cancer screening among attendants at the UCI. The goal is to use these data to inform a future opportunistic intervention. Female attendants 25 years of age or older were included in this focus group study. The focus group discussions explored knowledge of cervical cancer and screening modalities, health information sources, barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening, and potential use of mobile phone technology to share cervical cancer screening information among one's social community. Data were analyzed using an inductive approach and thematic analysis. Results showed moderate understanding of risk factors for cervical cancer, supplemented by misinformation. Knowledge of symptoms of advanced cervical cancer was high. Most participants were aware that cervical cancer screening exists but knew little about screening modalities. Responses were mixed regarding preferred information sources, and included healthcare workers and facilities, radio and family members. Participants were enthusiastic about mobile phone messaging to provide information about screening but emphasized a need to catch their attention and incentivize screening with promise of good such as sugar, demonstrating prioritization of immediate needs over future cancer risk. These results will inform an intervention which aims to connect female caregivers with free screening available at the adjacent cancer prevention clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.