Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39723184›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

A triple protein-based ELISA for differential detection of ASFV antibodies.

Shuai Zhang, Yuzhu Zuo, Wenyuan Gu, Yunhuan Zhao, Ying Liu, Jinghui Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuai Zhang *College of Veterinary Medicine, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China.
Yuzhu Zuo *College of Veterinary Medicine, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China.
Wenyuan GuHebei Animal Disease Control Center, Shijiazhuang, China.
Yunhuan ZhaoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China.
Ying LiuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China.
Jinghui FanCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) caused by the ASF virus (ASFV) is a severe and highly contagious viral disease that poses a significant threat to the global pig industry. As no vaccines or effective drugs are available to aid prevention and control, early detection is crucial. The emergence of the low-virulence ASFV strain not expressing CD2v/MGFs (ASFVΔCD2v/ΔMGFs) has been identified domestically and internationally and has even become an epidemic in China, resulting in a complex epidemic. The commercialized ASFV ELISA kits available can detect the presence of ASFV infection in pigs, but they are unable to distinguish wild-type ASFV from gene-deleted strains. The current published ELISA assays can distinguish between the wild-type and CD2v gene-deleted ASFV but cannot differentiate wild-type and MGF505 gene-deleted ASFV or CD2v and MGF505 double-gene deleted ASFV infection, posing new challenges for an effective prevention and control of ASFV. In this study, the ASFV-p30, ASFV-CD2v, and ASFV-MGF505 proteins were expressed using a prokaryotic expression system, and a triple protein-based ELISA antibody detection method based on these proteins was successfully established to effectively differentiate between wild-type ASFV and ASFVΔCD2v and/or ASFVΔMGF505 virus infection. This triple protein-based ELISA showed good analytical specificity without cross-reactivity with antibodies against PRRSV, CSFV, PRV, and PCV2. Moreover, it demonstrates remarkable analytical sensitivity by allowing the identification of clinical samples even at dilutions as high as 1:800. The coefficient of variation the intra-assay and inter-assay were below 5%, indicating strong repeatability and reproducibility. To evaluate the performance of the triple protein-based ELISA, a total of 59 clinical serum samples were detected using the triple protein-based ELISA. The results showed that 22 samples were positive for ASFV, of which 19 were ASFV wild-type, one was ASFVΔCD2v, and two were ASFVΔMGF505. Compared with the commercialized triplex qPCR kit, the triple protein-based ELISA exhibited high diagnostic sensitivity and diagnostic specificity. The test accuracy with the commercialized triplex qPCR kit was 98.31% (58/59), and the test accuracy with the commercialized ELISA kit was 96.61% (57/59). These results indicated that the developed triple protein-based ELISA performs well in detection and differentiation. Therefore, it will be useful for the ASFV serological differential diagnosis and epidemiology study.

Indexed as

African swine fever virusdifferential diagnosisgene-deleted strainindirect ELISAwild-type strain

Identifiers

PMID39723184
PMCPMC11669292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.