Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39723134›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024

Porcine peritoneal macrophages are susceptible to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection.

Kassandra Durazo-Martinez, Jayeshbhai Chaudhari, Sushmita Kumari, Hiep L X Vu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kassandra Durazo-MartinezDepartment of Animal Science and Nebraska Center for Virology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Jayeshbhai ChaudhariDepartment of Animal Science and Nebraska Center for Virology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Sushmita KumariSchool of Veterinary Science and Nebraska Center for Virology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Hiep L X VuDepartment of Animal Science and Nebraska Center for Virology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that porcine peritoneal macrophages (PPMs) are resistant to PRRSV infection, whereas porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) are highly susceptible. This contrast is intriguing, as both cell types belong to the same monocyte/macrophage family. The current study aimed to investigate the host factors contributing to the differing susceptibility of PPMs and PAMs to PRRSV infection. We found that PPMs exhibit a higher frequency of CD14

Indexed as

CD163porcine peritoneal macrophagesPRRSVswine virustropism

Identifiers

PMID39723134
PMCPMC11668767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.