Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39723128›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024

Engraftment of self-renewing endometrial epithelial organoids promotes endometrial regeneration by differentiating into functional glands in rats.

Yana Ma, Jingjing Qian, Xin Xu, Cheng Wei, Minyuan Wang, Peipei Zhang, Sijia Chen, Lingyan Zhang, Yanling Zhang, Yanpeng Wang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yana MaAssisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jingjing QianAssisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xin XuAssisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Cheng WeiAssisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Minyuan WangAssisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Peipei ZhangAssisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Sijia ChenAssisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Lingyan ZhangAssisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yanling ZhangAssisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yanpeng WangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Wenzhi XuAssisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Mengying Liu *Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaona Lin *Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Extensive trauma frequently disrupts endometrial regeneration by diminishing endometrial stem cells/progenitor cells, affecting female fertility. While bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BMSC) transplantation has been suggested as an approach to address endometrial injury, it comes with certain limitations. Recent advancements in endometrial epithelial organoids (EEOs) have displayed encouraging potential for endometrial regeneration. Therefore, this study aims to explore whether EEOs surpass BMSCs in their ability to repair injured endometrium and to examine whether the restoration process involves the integration of EEOs into the endometrial tissue of the recipient. Methods: We developed rat EEOs (rEEOs) mimicking the features of the rat endometrium. Subsequently, we created a rat model of endometrial injury to compare the effects of rEEOs and rat BMSCs (rBMSCs) on endometrial regeneration and reproductive recovery. Bulk RNA-sequencing analysis was conducted to further investigate the capacity of rEEOs for endometrial regeneration and to identify discrepancies between rEEOs and rBMSCs. Additionally, to track the fate of the transplanted cells Results: In a rat model of endometrial injury, we observed that fertility recovery in rats transplanted with rEEOs was more comparable to that of normal rats than in those treated with rBMSC. rEEOs possess a high concentration of endometrial epithelial stem/progenitor cells and secrete vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A to promote endometrial neovascularization. Significantly, we observed that cells from GFP-labelled rEEOs could integrate and differentiate into functional glands within the injured endometrium of recipient rats. Discussion: EEOs offer a transformative approach to address the challenges of endometrial trauma. Their remarkable regenerative potential holds promise for the restoration of damaged endometrium. As we venture into the future, the concept of utilizing patient-specific EEOs for transplantation emerges as a tantalizing prospect. However, the EEOs in our experiments were mainly cultured in Matrigel, which has barriers to clinical translation as a biomaterial, a new biomaterial to be explored. Secondly, our experiments have been successful only in rat models, and more efforts need to be made before clinical translation.

Indexed as

3D-culturebone marrow mesenchymal stem cellsendometrial epithelial organoidsendometrial regenerationinfertilitytransplantation

Identifiers

PMID39723128
PMCPMC11668608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.