ArticleOrthopedic reviews2024
Optimizing Cervical Epidural Steroid Injections: A Case Report.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practice Patterns and Perspectives on Epidural Steroid Injections by Interventional Pain Physicians.Pain and therapy · 2025Article
- Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Chronic Spinal Pain: A Clinical Review of Efficacy and Evidence.Cureus · 2025Review
- Article
- Safety of Catheter-Based Cervical Epidural Steroid Injections: A Retrospective Review.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical radiculopathy is characterized by pain, numbness, and weakness in the upper limbs. This is typically caused by nerve root compression. While conservative treatments like physical therapy and oral analgesics are often used, they may not be effective in more severe cases. Cervical epidural steroid injections (CESIs), particularly through the interlaminar approach, may be considered when these initial treatments fail. This case report discusses a female patient with severe left upper extremity pain consistent with C5/6 and C6/7 radiculopathy who did not respond to conservative therapies. An interlaminar CESI was initially performed at the C7/T1 level, but the contrast flow was inadequate for effective drug delivery. Repositioning the needle at the C6/C7 interspace improved contrast distribution, successfully targeting the affected levels. The patient experienced a 90% reduction in symptoms three weeks after the procedure, underscoring the importance of accurate contrast flow assessment and needle placement in CESIs. This case highlights the effectiveness of CESI in treating cervical radiculopathy and the critical role of precise technique in achieving positive patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.