ArticleFood science & nutrition2024
Purification and Characterization of Pinto Bean Protein Using Membrane Technology.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pinto beans, an underutilized legume, are abundant in protein content and contain a variety of beneficial phytonutrients. However, the commonly used protein extraction method, alkaline extraction, is associated with several drawbacks. These drawbacks include low extraction yield and purity as well as the production of large amounts of wastewater that can lead to environmental hazards. In this regard, membrane technology has gained considerable recognition as a superior method for extracting proteins. A combined processing scheme was developed, which included alkaline extraction at pH 10.5, ultrafiltration with a concentration factor of 5.5, diafiltration with a diavolume of 4, and isoelectric precipitation at pH 4.5 followed by freeze drying. The specific functional characteristics (nitrogen solubility index, water and oil holding capacity, and emulsifying and foaming properties) of the protein concentrates were assessed and compared with those of a commercially available soybean protein isolate. Based on pinto bean flour containing 23.9% protein, 85.5% of the protein was recovered in the products of this process: precipitated protein concentrate (PPC) with 86.4% protein, acid-soluble protein concentrate (ASP-C) with 56.3% protein, and meal residue with 6.1% protein. The mass yields were 17.3% in PPC, 3.9% in ASP-C, and 54% in the meal residue. The precipitated protein showed higher emulsifying activity, and the acid-soluble protein showed a high nitrogen solubility index (NSI) and oil-holding capacity. Both proteins had comparable foaming properties to commercial soy protein isolate. The project demonstrated the feasibility of protein production from pinto beans and highlighted the proteins' useful food functionality and good potential for commercialization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.