Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39723022›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024

Doctor-patient communication practices: A cross-sectional survey on Indian physicians.

Shubha Singhal, Rima B Shah, Sumit Bansal, Siddhartha Dutta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The high pedestal of morality: A guiding light for society.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shubha SinghalDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Rima B ShahDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Sumit BansalDepartment of Anesthesia, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Siddhartha DuttaDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Effective communication is a critical and fundamental element of a successful medical practice and exerts a substantial influence on patient contentment, adherence, and disease outcome. This study was planned to identify domains for improvement in doctor-patient communication to enhance good practices in the future. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out involving 500 randomly selected samples of clinicians from government or private medical colleges across India. Data collection about current communication practices was carried out using google questionnaire forms and analysed. Results: Among the practitioners, there were 315 males and 185 females. The average time spent on patients' consultation is 9.8 minutes. Nearly 80% of doctors do not introduce themselves to the patients, while half of the doctors consistently employ the patient's name throughout discussion. The majority (82.8%) of the doctors listen to the patients attentively and showed empathy and positive attitude towards them. The maximum number of the doctors (55%) check that they comprehend what the patient explains about the disease, explain the need of prescribed tests (78%), and inform the result of the examination to the patient (68.8%). Approximately half of the study participants did not discuss the advantages and disadvantages of given treatments, but 78% of them agreed to do so in the future. More than half of clinicians schedule patient interviews to break unpleasant news. The majority of the doctors (60.8%) communicate the future treatment strategy and prognosis to patients. Conclusion: Overall, a positive attitude was observed; however, a few domains that needed improvements were discussing awareness of the disease, advantages and disadvantages of treatment, and patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

Bad newsclinicianscommunicationdisease outcomepatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID39723022
PMCPMC11668429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.