Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39722999›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024

A sequential explanatory mixed method study of maternal and fetal outcome in gestational diabetes mellitus using Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI) test in Puducherry.

S Ilamathi, T H Sunitha, M Rajalakshmi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S IlamathiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India.
T H SunithaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sri Dharmastala Manjunatheshwara College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Karnataka, India.
M RajalakshmiDepartment of Community Medicine, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnancy is associated with polyhydramnios, macrosomia, and shoulder dystocia, and it also increases maternal and perinatal mortality. Methods: This sequential explanatory mixed-method study was conducted for six months. All the pregnant women attending the outpatient department of the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department at 24-28 weeks of gestation were subjected to universal screening with 75 gms of glucose and 2 hours of plasma glucose >140 mgs% is taken for diagnosis (according to DIPSI guidelines). After diagnosis, they were subjected to an HbA1c test. Women with HbA1c is >6.5% were excluded from the study. If pregnant women are screened negative by the DIPSI test, the test was repeated in the third trimester (32-34 weeks of gestation). Chi-square tests were used to find out the test of association for quantitative data and manual content analysis was performed for qualitative data. Results: DIPSI test was found to decrease the adverse maternal and neonatal outcome by early screening and management. The stakeholders' perspectives identified by key informant interview were improper knowledge and awareness about the testing and others were anxiety and fear associated with the testing procedure. Conclusions: As DIPSI test is an effective single step in screening and diagnostic test, hence all pregnant mothers should undergo this glucose challenge test in their antenatal visits.

Indexed as

DIPSIGDMmorbiditymortalitypregnant women

Identifiers

PMID39722999
PMCPMC11668377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.