Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39722976›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024

Relationship between proxy behavior in clinic attendance and disease control among persons with hypertension and diabetes at a rural primary health center: A cohort analysis in South India.

Viswanath Narendiran, Nishaant Ramasamy, Sonali Sarkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Viswanath NarendiranDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Nishaant RamasamyDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Sonali SarkarDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Among persons with hypertension and diabetes on treatment for at least 1 year at the Rural Health Centre (RHC) noncommunicable disease (NCD) clinic, 1. To determine the control status for hypertension and diabetes. 2. To assess the relationship between proxy behavior for collection of medications and the control status. Settings and Design: Rural Health Centre, Ramanathapuram, Puducherry, India; record-based retrospective observational study. Methods and Material: The study employed a universal sampling of 396 eligible persons with diabetes and hypertension who had been on medication for over a year at the RHC NCD clinic and had recorded blood pressure and glucose values within the last 4 months. Case sheets of these patients were retrieved from the Medical Registration Department, and data from the past 12 months were collected and analyzed to assess proxy behaviors and absenteeism. Statistical Analysis Used: Data were entered from the case sheets in Epicollect5 and analyzed using Stata v17. Results: Among hypertensive patients, 48.01% were aged 60 and above, with 55.63% being female. Fifty-six percent of hypertensive patients had their condition controlled. For diabetic patients, 40.88% were aged 45-59 years, with 59.75% being female. Only 18.24% of diabetic patients had their condition controlled. The multivariable analysis examined factors associated with the control status of hypertension and diabetes. Those aged 30-44 (aRR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.01-2.15) and 45-59 (aRR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.03-1.82) had a higher risk of uncontrolled hypertension compared to those aged 60 and above. Gender did not show significant associations with hypertension control status. Regarding attendance status, patients who had both proxy and missed visits (RR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.02-2.07) had a higher risk of uncontrolled hypertension. There was also a significant association with patients having more than three proxies (aRR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.10-2.17) exhibiting a higher risk of uncontrolled hypertension. Absenteeism status showed that those absent for 1-3 visits had a higher relative risk (RR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.03-1.82) of uncontrolled hypertension compared to those with no absenteeism. Conclusion: Proxy behavior affects the control status of persons with hypertension and diabetes. A longitudinal study is warranted to assess the relationship between proxy visits and control status.

Indexed as

Control statusdiabeteshypertensionmedication adherenceNCDproxy

Identifiers

PMID39722976
PMCPMC11668391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.