Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39722955›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024

Assessment of appropriate utilization of out-of-office diagnostic tools for the diagnosis of hypertension.

Hussam Jnaid, Mohammed Aldosari, Mohammad Waqar Ahmad, Yaser Alendijani, Amira BaGubair, Dalal Alhaffar, Zainab Albasheer, Mansour Alrasheed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hussam JnaidDepartment of Family Medicine and Polyclinics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AldosariDepartment of Family Medicine and Polyclinics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Waqar AhmadDepartment of Family Medicine and Polyclinics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia.
Yaser AlendijaniDepartment of Family Medicine and Polyclinics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia.
Amira BaGubairDepartment of Family Medicine and Polyclinics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia.
Dalal AlhaffarDepartment of Family Medicine and Polyclinics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia.
Zainab AlbasheerDepartment of Family Medicine and Polyclinics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia.
Mansour AlrasheedDepartment of Family Medicine and Polyclinics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement devices, such as ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and home BP monitoring (HBPM), enhance the accuracy and reliability of BP readings, detecting white-coat and masked hypertension. The American Heart Association (AHA) advises confirming hypertension diagnoses with ABPM to prevent overdiagnosis, emphasizing the importance of precise out-of-office diagnostic tools. This study aimed to 1) explore the prevalence of ABPM and HBPM use prior to hypertension diagnosis; 2) assess the adherence to AHA recommendations regarding ABPM utilization; and 3) investigate the association between patient characteristics and out-of-office BP monitoring practices. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed a random sample of adult patients newly diagnosed with essential hypertension at a tertiary hospital primary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between 2016 and 2022. Results: This study evaluated the use of ABPM and HBPM in a sample of 268 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, with a mean age of 49.17 ± 12.69 years. Although ABPM orders were placed for 57.8% of patients, only 48.5% completed the procedure. Notably, 42.2% of hypertension diagnoses were solely based on ABPM, while 7.1% and 1.1% utilized HBPM alone or in combination with ABPM, respectively. This analysis revealed a lower utilization of ABPM among older adults, individuals with diabetes or chronic kidney disease, and married patients ( Conclusion: Out-of-office BP monitoring, particularly ABPM, was underutilized in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, especially in older age groups and patients with specific comorbidities, who may benefit the most from this method. These results underscore the need for increasing physician knowledge and compliance with the existing guidelines.

Indexed as

ABPMAHA guidelinediagnosisHBPMhypertension

Identifiers

PMID39722955
PMCPMC11668483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.