Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39722914›Full record

ReviewJournal of family medicine and primary care2024

Exploring frailty prevalence among adults in Indian healthcare settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aninda Debnath, Sunanda Gupta, Ankit Yadav, Shweta Charag, Anubhav Mondal, Jugal Kishore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frailty: An overview.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aninda DebnathDepartment of Community Medicine, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Sunanda GuptaDepartment of Community Medicine, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Ankit YadavDepartment of Community Medicine, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Shweta CharagDepartment of Community Medicine, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Anubhav MondalDepartment of Community Medicine, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Jugal KishoreDepartment of Community Medicine, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frailty is an age-associated state of increased vulnerability due to declines in physiologic systems, leading to compromised ability to withstand stressors. Given India's rapidly aging population, our study aims to estimate the pooled prevalence of frailty and its associated factors in hospital settings. An extensive search was conducted across four databases, up to January 2024. A random-effects model was utilized. To quantify heterogeneity, the I² statistic, prediction interval, and the Chi-square-based Q test were employed. Outliers were identified using a Baujat plot and influence analysis. Doi plot, luis furuya kanamori (LFK) index and funnel plot were used to assess publication bias. The current meta-analysis determined a pooled frailty prevalence of 42.3% (95%CI: 34.8%-50.1%) and prefrailty prevalence of 39.8% (95%CI: 30.4%-49.8%), both exhibiting high heterogeneity (I² values of 96.9% and 95.3%, respectively). A high degree of variability was indicated by a prediction interval ranging from 9% to 76%, while Egger's test suggested no evidence of publication bias. Our systematic review and meta-analysis, encompassing 6,856 individuals, revealed a considerable prevalence of frailty at 42.3%, underscoring its ubiquity across health spectra and demographics in India.

Indexed as

Frailfrailtymeta-analysisquality of lifesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39722914
PMCPMC11668389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.