Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39722902›Full record

ReviewJournal of family medicine and primary care2024

Telemedicine: Future of the healthcare system and its impact on patient satisfaction: A literature review.

Malik Salman, Ryan Kimball, Sarah Bromley, Troy Belleville, Ali B A Jabbar, Mohsin Mirza, Shagufta Hayat, Akshat Sood, Abubakar Tauseef

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Telemedicine: Boon or curse? In view of antimicrobial resistance.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Malik SalmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Nebraska, United States.
Ryan KimballDepartment of Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Nebraska, United States.
Sarah BromleyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Nebraska, United States.
Troy BellevilleDepartment of Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Nebraska, United States.
Ali B A JabbarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Nebraska, United States.
Mohsin MirzaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Nebraska, United States.
Shagufta HayatDepartment of Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Nebraska, United States.
Akshat SoodDepartment of Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Nebraska, United States.
Abubakar TauseefDepartment of Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Nebraska, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The utilization of telemedicine has increased dramatically since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this review, we examined studies published within the past five years that investigated the impact of telemedicine on patient satisfaction. Methods: Four investigators utilized PubMed and Google Scholar to find studies published within the past five years that assessed patient satisfaction with telemedicine in the field of adult primary care, using either the Press Ganey or CAHPS surveys. Studies that compared cost and quality of care between telemedicine and in-patient healthcare were also included to address the secondary aims of this study. Results: A total of 11 studies out of the 405 that were investigated were selected for this review. Five studies found no significant difference in patient satisfaction between telemedicine and in-person medicine, with one of those showing a patient preference for telemedicine. One study demonstrated significantly higher satisfaction with in-person medicine vs. telemedicine. Another study found that most physicians and patients reported no perceived difference in quality of care between telemedicine and in-person visitation. One study found no difference in patient satisfaction with telemedicine between immigrants and non-immigrants. Another study showed that patients have higher satisfaction when using telemedicine with their PCP vs. an unfamiliar provider. Two studies found telemedicine to be cost-effective. Conclusions: Our review concludes that patient satisfaction with telemedicine is not inferior to that with in-person visits. However, further research should be conducted to determine various factors that may affect patient perception and satisfaction.

Indexed as

Patient satisfactiontelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39722902
PMCPMC11668441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.