ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
The frequent variant A57F in the
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of diagnostic pitfalls in 125 genetically confirmed cases of distal myopathies.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: GNE-myopathy is a distal myopathy with adult-onset and initial involvement of anterior leg compartment. A founder effect has been demonstrated for some patients from several large cohorts in different countries. Methods: In this study, we investigated the allele frequency of the c.169_170delinsTT (p.(Ala57Phe)) variant in the GNE gene (NM_001128227.3) among different ethnic populations (Mari, Tatar, and Bashkir) and estimated the age of the mutation's spread event. Results: The c.169_170delinsTT variant in the GNE gene was detected in the Mari population with an allele frequency of 0.003788 but was not found in the Tatar or Bashkir populations. The disease incidence is estimated to be 1.43 (95% CI: 0.00092-43.78) per 100,000 in the Mari population. According to our study, the estimated age of the mutation's spread is 160.46 years (95% CI: 45.55-244.14). Discussion: By comparing the information gathered with historical data on migration patterns in the Middle Volga region and estimating the age of the variant's dissemination, we propose hypotheses regarding its origin and the pathways through which it spread. In the current context of increased rate of interethnic marriages, investigating the spread of common pathogenic variants from historically isolated populations is important for molecular genetic diagnosis. This approach aids in optimizing diagnostic processes and reducing the diagnostic odyssey for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.