ArticleInternational journal of women's health2024
The Burden of Pain Symptoms in Individuals with Uterine Fibroids-Results from a Prospective Observational Study in the USA.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Self-Reported Experiences of Women Taking Hormonal Treatments for Their Endometriosis and Uterine Fibroids Symptoms: Results from a Real-World Study in the US (MyEndoUF).International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To characterize the burden of uterine fibroids (UF) in individuals experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) and moderate-to-severe UF-associated pain in terms of symptoms experienced, impact on work and activities, and pain medication use both on menstrual and non-menstrual days. Patients and Methods: This prospective, real-world, observational study enrolled 350 participants in the USA with a self-reported UF diagnosis, HMB, and moderate-to-severe pain due to UF. Data collection took place from February 9 to July 19, 2021. Over 4 months, participants used an online platform to self-report daily menstrual status, bleeding intensity, UF-associated pain severity, and pain medication use, and to complete weekly work and productivity questionnaires. Results were analyzed descriptively and are reported for the overall population, by pain medication subgroups-defined based on the most potent medication taken-and menstrual versus non-menstrual days/weeks. Results: The analysis population consisted of 307 participants with ≤5 consecutive missing days of daily survey responses or ≥75% completion rate of the daily surveys. Mean age of participants (standard deviation; SD) was 37.2 (6.3) years. At baseline, 54.1% of participants reported not currently taking medication for treatment of HMB. Over the study period, mean UF-associated pain scores (SD; scale range 0-10) were higher on menstrual days (3.5 [2.7]) than non-menstrual days (1.0 [1.8]), and this was consistent across medication use subgroups. Pain medications were used more frequently on menstrual days than non-menstrual days (22.9% versus 3.7% days of pain medication use, respectively). Participants reported 31.5% work impairment on menstrual weeks versus a 12.7% work impairment on non-menstrual weeks. Conclusion: In this study, UF-associated pain symptoms coincided with a reduction in individuals' ability to take part in both work and non-work activities and an increase in pain medication use, particularly during menstrual weeks. These results highlight the need for improved diagnosis and pain management strategies in UF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.