ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2025
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Decision-Making About Reproductive Health and Epilepsy: A Survey of Health Care Providers and Women With Epilepsy.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contraceptive management in people with epilepsy: A narrative review of drug interactions, special populations, and clinical guidance.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026Review
- Preferences of Adolescents and Young Adults With Epilepsy and Caregivers on Reproductive Health Counseling by Neurologists: A Concept Mapping Study.Pediatric neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Cisgender women with epilepsy (WWE) have distinct reproductive health needs. It is unknown to what extent WWE and their health care providers (HCPs) are aware of recent research advances regarding the reproductive health of WWE. This study aimed to survey US health care providers and WWE about their knowledge, attitudes, and decision-making pertaining to reproductive health; their awareness of key findings from recent relevant research; and whether learning of these findings would change their decision-making. Methods: A market research firm conducted an online survey of US health care providers and WWE using a proprietary nationally representative panel. Eligible HCPs included physicians and advance practice providers in neurology, obstetrics-gynecology, and primary care, who treat WWE. Eligible WWE were 18-45 years old and reported an epilepsy diagnosis and taking antiseizure medication. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Results: Four hundred one HCPs and 199 WWE completed the full survey. Among HCPs, 38% reported being very or extremely comfortable treating pregnant WWE. Seventy-nine percent of HCPs reported that recent relevant research findings were new to them, with 65% reporting that the findings seemed plausible and 49% reporting that the findings would probably or definitely change their management of pregnancy for WWE.Thirty percent of WWE reported that pregnancy is very or extremely safe for WWE, while 50% reported that it is somewhat safe, and 21% not at all or not very safe. Ninety-one percent of WWE reported that research findings were new to them, 37% reported that the findings seemed plausible, and 64% reported that the findings would probably or definitely influence their reproductive decision-making. Discussion: Survey findings suggest suboptimal awareness of recent research advances pertaining to the reproductive health of WWE among WWE and their HCPs. Findings also suggest that dissemination and implementation of such findings may be impactful on the medical decision-making of both HCPs and WWE. Findings may guide future initiatives to ensure prompt dissemination and implementation of research advances in epilepsy and reproductive health.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.