ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Machine learning algorithms for the early detection of bloodstream infection in children with osteoarticular infections.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differentiating septic arthritis from non-infectious inflammatory causes of acute monoarticular arthritis in children: A machine learning approach based on routine laboratory tests.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Cytokine-Based Insights into Bloodstream Infections and Bacterial Gram Typing in ICU COVID-19 Patients.Metabolites · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bloodstream infection (BSI) poses a significant life-threatening risk in pediatric patients with osteoarticular infections. Timely identification of BSI is crucial for effective management and improved patient outcomes. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model for the early identification of BSI in children with osteoarticular infections. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on pediatric patients diagnosed with osteoarticular infections admitted to three hospitals in China between January 2012 and January 2023. All patients underwent blood and puncture fluid bacterial cultures. Sixteen early available variables were selected, and eight different ML algorithms were applied to construct the model by training on these data. The accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of these models. The Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values were utilized to explain the predictive value of each variable on the output of the model. Results: The study comprised 181 patients in the BSI group and 420 in the non-BSI group. Random Forest exhibited the best performance, with an AUC of 0.947 ± 0.016. The model demonstrated an accuracy of 0.895 ± 0.023, a sensitivity of 0.847 ± 0.071, a specificity of 0.917 ± 0.007, a precision of 0.813 ± 0.023, and an F1 score of 0.828 ± 0.040. The four most significant variables in both the feature importance matrix plot of the Random Forest model and the SHAP summary plot were procalcitonin (PCT), neutrophil count (N), leukocyte count (WBC), and fever days. Conclusions: The Random Forest model proved to be effective in early and timely identification of BSI in children with osteoarticular infections. Its application could aid in clinical decision-making and potentially mitigate the risk associated with delayed or inaccurate blood culture results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.