ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
AI frontiers in emergency care: the next evolution of nursing interventions.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ethical challenges in the algorithmic era: a systematic rapid review of risk insights and governance pathways for nursing predictive analytics and early warning systems.BMC medical ethics · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Perceptions and attitudes of emergency department nurses toward artificial intelligence applications in triage: a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Ethical considerations of artificial intelligence in emergency medicine for triage and resource allocation: a scoping review.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Feasibility of a multimodal AI-based clinical assessment platform in emergency care: an exploratory pilot study.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Effects of optimizing emergency nursing care process on success rate of rescue and incidence of adverse reactions in patients with acute chest pain.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review explores the utilization of artificial intelligence in emergency nursing, assessing its impact, potential benefits, and the obstacles faced in its adoption. It covers the scope of AI from advanced triage protocols to continuous monitoring of patients, assistance in diagnosis, and providing support for clinical decisions. The review notes that AI in emergency healthcare can lead to more efficient care and timely, data-driven actions, but also highlights significant issues such as safeguarding patient data, the necessity for dependable infrastructure, and concerns over discriminatory algorithms. The promise of AI in improving emergency healthcare practices and patient care is clear, yet the identified challenges must be carefully navigated to promote safe and ethical use. Further empirical research is called for to confirm the effectiveness of AI applications in the dynamic environment of emergency care setups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.