ArticleThe Journal of physiology2025
Computational modelling of cardiac control following myocardial infarction using an in silico patient cohort.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Loss of cardiac physiological function following myocardial infarction (MI) is accompanied by neural adaptations in the baroreflex that are compensatory in the short term, but then become associated with long-term disease progression. One marker of these adaptations is decreased baroreflex sensitivity, a strong predictor of post-MI mortality. The relative contributions of cardiac remodelling and neural adaptation in the sensory, central brainstem and peripheral ganglionic loci to baroreflex sensitivity changes remain underexplored. We used a computational model-based approach that accounts for the short-term dynamics of closed-loop human cardiac control to integrate disparate experimental studies on neural adaptation following MI into a unified quantitative framework. We developed an ensemble of 59 distinct model parameterizations that account for the clinically observed heterogeneity of cardiac control in healthy individuals. We simulated an in silico cohort of 35,400 patients with MI, corresponding to six scenarios of one or more loci of neural adaptation coupled with cardiac remodelling. We evaluated the range of MI-induced shifts in arterial pressure, heart rate and baroreflex curve responses. Our results show that adaptation in any single neural locus coupled with cardiac remodelling is sufficient to account for the MI-induced haemodynamic and autonomic changes observed experimentally. Of the adaptation pathways, we found that individuals with central or peripheral vagal efferent adaptation and preserved baroreceptor gain could maintain high baroreflex sensitivity after ischaemic injury. These results suggest that there are a multitude of adaptive pathways for tuning the baroreflex circuit to shift cardiac control physiology, potentially explaining patient heterogeneity post-MI. KEY POINTS: Baroreflex sensitivity is a strong indicator of post-myocardial ischaemia survival and is variable among individuals. We fine-tuned a computational model ensemble based on physiological observations to develop an in silico patient cohort consistent with the range of baroreflex responses observed experimentally. Simulation and analysis of the in silico cohort show that individuals with a functional afferent pathway and the ability to adapt along the vagal efferent pathway can maintain baroreflex sensitivity post-cardiac ischaemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.