Trial reportCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Mechanistic Learning for Predicting Survival Outcomes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Trial report in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02268695 (TPExtreme), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
TPExtreme: Randomized, Controlled Trial of Platinum-Cetuximab Combined Either With Docetaxel (TPEx) or With 5FU (Extreme) in Patients With Recurrent/Metastatic Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Model-Based Patient Selection and Dosing Strategies for HRAS and PIK3CA Dysregulated HNSCC: A QSP Model for Alpelisib and Tipifarnib Combination.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We employed a mechanistic learning approach, integrating on-treatment tumor kinetics (TK) modeling with various machine learning (ML) models to address the challenge of predicting post-progression survival (PPS)-the duration from the time of documented disease progression to death-and overall survival (OS) in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC). We compared the predictive power of model-derived TK parameters versus RECIST and assessed the efficacy of nine TK-OS ML models against conventional survival models. Data from 526 advanced HNSCC patients treated with chemotherapy and cetuximab in the TPExtreme trial were analyzed using a double-exponential model. TK parameters from the first line and maintenance (TKL1) or after four cycles (TK4) were used to predict PPS and post-cycle 4 OS (OS4), combined with 12 baseline parameters. While ML algorithms underperformed compared to the Cox model for PPS, a random survival forest was superior for OS prediction using TK4 and surpassed RECIST-based metrics. This model demonstrated unbiased OS4 prediction, suggesting its potential for improving HNSCC treatment evaluation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02268695.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.