Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39722547›Full record

ArticleApplied psychology. Health and well-being2025

From mere 'stability' to 'durability'-Revisiting intention dynamics from a self-regulatory perspective with intensive longitudinal methods.

Christopher M Jones, Mark Conner, Benjamin Schüz

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher M JonesMedical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3182-8244
Mark ConnerSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Benjamin SchüzUniversity of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0801-498X

Funding

Volkswagen Foundation A1344671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral intentions predict behavior better if they are stable over time. A statistical argument suggests that this is due to less measurement error, but recent theoretical advances suggest self-regulatory effects: durable intentions remain temporally stable due to their persistence when faced with challenges. Here, we leverage intensive longitudinal data on adherence with non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) during the COVID-19 pandemic (N = 623; total assessments = 19,740; study duration: 6 months each). We operationalize intention durability as temporal order-dependent variability (reversed root mean square of successive differences [RMSSD] between each valid assessment). We then examine the within- and between-person moderating effects of intention durability on the intention-behavior association as well as the effects of past on current behavior. In line with the theoretical assumptions, we find that more durable intentions are not only associated with a stronger intention-behavior link on a within- and a between-person level but also a stronger effect of past on current adherence with NPIs. Our findings support the hypothesized moderating effects of intention durability and provide a more nuanced understanding of the self-regulatory processes underlying the temporal stability of intentions.

Indexed as

COVID-19IntentionSelf-ControlAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPatient Complianceambulatory assessmenthealth behaviorintentionintention stabilityreasoned actionself‐regulation

Identifiers

PMID39722547
PMCPMC11725554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.