ArticleThe American journal of case reports2024
An Accessory Right Hepatic and Cystic Arteries Derived from the Superior Mesenteric Artery: A Cadaveric Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The configuration of the hepatic arteries is known to vary substantially between individuals. Here, we report a rare retroperitoneal configuration of an accessory hepatic artery existing alongside a left and right hepatic artery branching from the proper hepatic artery. During routine dissection, we discovered an anomalous configuration of the hepatic arteries that does not fit the commonly used categorizations for abnormal hepatic vasculature. We briefly discuss potential implications of this finding. CASE REPORT The left and right hepatic arteries branch directly from the common hepatic artery and supply the liver. The accessory hepatic artery arises directly from the superior mesenteric artery, travels posterior to the portal triad, and enters the porta hepatis. It was found to travel posterior to the neck of the pancreas, duodenum, and portal triad at the same depth as the inferior vena cava, suggesting that the accessory right hepatic artery was traveling retroperitoneally, posterior to the opening of the lesser sac. The accessory hepatic artery exclusively supplies the cystic arteries. Considering existing classification schemes, our case most closely resembles Michels's type 6 and Hiatt's type 3, but most specifically López-Andújar's type 6. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first reported cases of a retroperitoneal accessory right hepatic artery. CONCLUSIONS Knowledge of the possible variations of the hepatic arteries is important to reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury and improve patient outcomes in surgery, especially in laparoscopic cases or pancreatoduodectomies where more unique variants may be especially difficult to identify or easier to injure. Future research should explore the frequency of retroperitoneal accessory right hepatic arteries, as their unique course may be easily missed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.