ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024
Users' Perspectives on the Organization of Rehabilitation Services - A Focus Group Study of User Organization Representatives in Norway.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unmet Needs for Community-Based Rehabilitation the First 12 Months Postinjury in a Traumatic Brain Injury Population with Moderate-to-Severe Trauma-a Longitudinal Cohort Study.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUser organizations for people with disabilities in Norway work for social equality and participation, and quality of health services for people with disabilities, chronic illnesses and reduced functional capacity. Consideration of the experiences from user representatives is necessary when determining the quality and appropriateness of the rehabilitation services. Rehabilitation services constitute the provision and delivery of intangible products to maintain or improve functioning in individual patients or patient groups. Rehabilitation services can be characterized at the policy (macro), organizational (meso) and individual (micro) levels.
objectivesTo explore user representatives' perspectives on rehabilitation service provision and organization and how they experience the influence they exert.
methodsFocus group interviews with 14 representatives nominated from 11 user organizations in Norway conducted in 2021. Two online focus groups using a semi-structured interview guide were conducted. Data analysis was performed according to Braun and Clarke's thematic data analysis.
resultsSix core themes were developed when analyzing the participants' experiences and opinions regarding rehabilitation services. The themes were inter-connected and addressed perspectives on Access to services, Integration of care, Rehabilitation team, Person centeredness, System and governance and Modes of user representation and contribution.
conclusionThe user representatives revealed tension and complexity influencing the provision and organization of rehabilitation services from individual access to health policy and regulation. Empowering user representatives through training was important to fight tokenism. Filling the role of a user representative at the meso level requires the integration of personal and peer experiences at the micro level, and knowledge of health policy regulations at the macro level. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The Norwegian Federation of Organisations of Persons with Disabilities recruited user representatives in this study. The user representatives participated in the assessment and discussion of the results of the study. The results were presented for discussion to the User panel at the Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM) at the University of Oslo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.