Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39722095›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Patterns of initial treatment and subsequent care escalation among medicare beneficiaries with neck pain: a retrospective cohort study.

Brian R Anderson, Todd A MacKenzie, Jon D Lurie, Leah Grout, James M Whedon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian R AndersonPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, 741 Brady St, Davenport, IA, 52803, USA. Brian.anderson@palmer.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8134-4697
Todd A MacKenzieGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Jon D LurieGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Leah GroutSouthern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA, USA.
James M WhedonSouthern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA, USA.

Funding

RAND REACH CenterU24AT012549 · NCCIH · RAND CORPORATION · PI COULTER, IAN DOUGLASS, HERMAN, PATRICIA M · 2023 to 2025
$6.2M
Spinal Manipulative Therapy vs. Prescription Drug Therapy for Care of Aged Medicare Beneficiaries with Neck PainR15AT010035 · NCCIH · SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNIV OF HEALTH SCIS · PI WHEDON, JAMES M. · 2018 to 2022
$897k
NCCIH NIH HHS 2R15AT010035-02NCCIH NIH HHS R15 AT010035NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT012549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare long-term care escalation encounters among three care patterns for new episodes of neck pain among Medicare beneficiaries.

methodsWe examined Medicare claims spanning a four-year period for beneficiaries with new episodes of neck pain beginning in 2019. All patients were continuously enrolled under Medicare parts A, B, and D and aged 65-99 years. We calculated the cumulative frequency and propensity- weighted rate ratios for escalated care encounters across three distinct, index-visit related neck pain treatment cohorts: 1) Spinal manipulative therapy; 2) Primary care without prescription analgesics within 7 days; 3) Primary care with prescription analgesics within 7 days.

resultsWhen compared to the primary care without analgesics cohort, the spinal manipulative therapy cohort was associated with a 64% lower rate (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.35,0.37) for long-term care escalation encounters, while the primary care with prescription analgesics cohort was associated with an 8% higher rate (RR 1.08; 95% CI 1.05,1.10).

conclusionInitial spinal manipulative therapy was associated with a significant reduction in downstream care escalation encounters among Medicare beneficiaries with new episodes of neck pain. Our study contributes to a growing body of evidence supporting the integration of non-pharmacological care strategies for neck pain management.

Indexed as

Manipulation, SpinalMedicareNeck PainPrimary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesicsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLong-Term CareMaleRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAnalgesicsHealth care utilizationNeck painPrescription drugsPrimary care physiciansSpinal manipulation

Identifiers

PMID39722095
PMCPMC13500031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.