ArticleCell & bioscience2024
Improved efficacy of therapeutic HPV DNA vaccine using intramuscular injection with electroporation compared to conventional needle and needle-free jet injector methods.
Article in Cell & bioscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05799144 (An Open-Label Phase II Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Feasibility, Efficacy and Immunological Correlates of Heterologous Prime-Boost With pBI-11), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Open-Label Phase II Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Feasibility, Efficacy and Immunological Correlates of Heterologous Prime-Boost With pBI-11 (IM) and TA-HPV (IM) Combined With Pembrolizumab as Treatment for Patients With Advanced, PD-L1 CPS≥1, hrHPV+ Oropharyngeal Cancer
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA-based vaccines: Advances, applications, and future prospects.Genes & diseases · 2026Review
- Effect of Driving Pressure Modes on Microjet Dispersion Characteristics in Tissue-Mimicking Gels for Large-Volume Needle-Free Injection.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Plasmid DNA Delivery into Mice by Intradermal Injections Alone and Facilitated by Sonoporation or Electroporation.Vaccines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe have previously developed a candidate therapeutic HPV DNA vaccine (pBI-11) encoding mycobacteria heat shock protein 70 linked to HPV16/18 E6/E7 proteins for the control of advanced HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer (NCT05799144). While naked DNA vaccines are readily produced, stable, and well tolerated, their potency is limited by the delivery efficiency. Here we compared three different IM delivery strategies, including intramuscular (IM) injection, either with a needle alone or with electroporation at the injection site, and a needle-free injection system (NFIS), for their ability to elicit gene expression and to improve the potency of pBI-11 DNA vaccine.
resultsWe found that electroporation after IM injection significantly increases gene expression from a luciferase-encoding DNA construct compared to IM injection alone or NFIS. We also showed that single administration of pBI-11 DNA via electroporation-mediated delivery generates the greatest increase in HPV antigen-specific CD8 + T cell-mediated immune responses, resulting in the most potent antitumor effect compared to the other two methods. We further compared the response to three repeat immunizations via each of these different methods. We found that electroporation-mediated delivery of pBI-11 DNA generates the greatest HPV antigen-specific CD8 + T cell immune responses and therapeutic antitumor effects compared to the other two methods. Monitoring of mouse behaviors and body weight, and necropsy indicated that electroporation-mediated delivery of clinical grade pBI-11 DNA vaccine was well-tolerated and presented no evident local or systemic toxicity.
conclusionsThese findings provide rationale for clinical testing of pBI-11 DNA vaccine delivered by electroporation for the control of HPV16/18-associated infections and/or cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.