ArticleBiology direct2024
Exploring the molecular mechanism of estrogen therapy effectiveness after TCRA in IUA patients at single-cell level.
Article in Biology direct, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrogel-Based Systems in Intrauterine Adhesions: Bridging the Gap from Bench to Bedside.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Three-Dimensional Bioprinting and Infertility-Related Female Reproductive System Diseases: A Review of Current and Future Applications.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Intrauterine adhesion after missed miscarriage evacuation: efficacy of different estrogen doses on incidence and risk factors.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntrauterine adhesion (IUA) is a common cause of clinically refractory infertility, and there exists significant heterogeneity in the treatment outcomes among IUA patients with the similar severity after transcervical resection of adhesion(TCRA). The underlying mechanism of different treatment outcomes occur remains elusive, and the precise contribution of various cell subtypes in this process remains uncertain.
resultsHere, we performed single-cell transcriptome sequencing on 10 human endometrial samples to establish a single-cell atlas differences between patients who responded to estrogen therapy and those who did not. The results showed increased infiltration of immune cells such as monocyte macrophages, T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells in patients who did not respond to estrogen therapy. Our findings indicate that distinct fibroblast subsets are implicated in the modulation of the Wnt, Hippo, and Hedgehog signaling pathways, as evidenced by functional enrichment analyses. This may have implications for the therapeutic efficacy in patients with IUA. Furthermore, we delineated the markers and transcriptional status of different macrophage subsets and identified two cell clusters, CXCL10high and CCL4L2high macrophage subsets, which are intimately associated with inflammation and fibrosis. The state of fibrosis and inflammatory response in human endometrial tissues with disparate treatment outcomes is revealed, and providing evidence to clarify the underlying determinants of sensitivity to estrogen therapy.
conclusionsWe described the transcriptional status of different cell subtypes in the two groups of patients, providing new ideas for exploring the molecular mechanism of the difference in the effectiveness of estrogen therapy in patients, and providing theoretical basis for providing precise and individualized treatment plans for IUA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.