ArticleBMC public health2024
Terpene mixtures and metabolic syndrome in the US general population: exploring the mediating role of insulin resistance.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTerpenes have been shown to have an effect on metabolic status. However, it is unclear how they are associated with the metabolic syndrome (MetS) and whether insulin resistance (IR) mechanisms are involved.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013-2014). Serum terpenes (α- pinene, β- pinene, and limonene) were quantified by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. MetS was diagnosed by lipid, glucose, blood pressure, and waist circumference criteria. IR status was assessed using the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) model and triglyceride-glucose index. Regression analysis models, mixed-effects models (weighted quantile sum regression models, quantile g-computation and Bayesian Kernel machine regression models), and mediation analysis were used for analysis.
resultsAmong 1563 U.S. general population (mean age 39.0 years), 447 (28.6%) had a diagnosis of MetS, and the median concentration was 0.08 ng/mL for α- pinene, 0.08 ng/mL for β- pinene, and 1.18 ng/mL for limonene. The terpene mixture showed positive joint association with MetS (OR = 1.454, 95%CI = 1.153, 1.833) and HOMA-IR (β = 0.569, 95%CI = 0.196, 0.942), with limonene contributing relatively large weights in both MetS (41.1%) and HOMA-IR (68.9%). Furthermore, HOMA-IR was positively associated with MetS (OR = 2.299, 95%CI = 1.888, 2.817) and its diagnostic components. When identified as a mediator, HOMA-IR accounted for approximately 15.8%, 20.0%, and 14.3% of the indirect effects between terpenes (α- pinene, β- pinene, and limonene) and MetS, respectively. The results were consistent when the IR biomarker was replaced by triglyceride-glucose index.
conclusionSerum terpenes were positively associated with MetS, which might be partially mediated by the mechanism of IR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.