ArticleThe clinical respiratory journal2024
Liver Function Biomarkers and Lung Cancer Risk: A Prospective Cohort Study in the UK Biobank.
Article in The clinical respiratory journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between elevated multiple circulating biomarkers and short-term mortality in critically ill lung cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Sex- and menopause-specific inverse associations between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations: evidence from SHIP and UK Biobank.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- Association of Pirfenidone and its Cardioprotective effects in Pentylenetetrazole-induced kindling model of Epilepsy through the High mobility group Box-1/Toll-Like Receptor-4 pathway.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of perioperative gamma-glutamyl transferase trajectories in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs the primary organ of metabolism and detoxification, the liver may contribute to the pathogenesis of lung cancer. We aimed to illuminate the intricate link between liver function biomarkers and lung cancer risk, as well as delineate the role of smoking behavior within this association.
methodsWe investigated the associations of seven liver function biomarkers levels (alkaline phosphatase [ALP], alanine transaminase [ALT], total bilirubin [TBIL], albumin [ALB], gamma-glutamyltransferase [GGT], aspartate transaminase [AST], and total protein [TP]) with lung cancer risk across the UK Biobank (N = 337 499) through restricted cubic splines and Cox proportional hazards models. Moreover, Mendelian randomization (MR) was utilized to evaluate the causal effect of smoking behavior on these biomarkers. Then a lung cancer risk prediction model was developed among smokers by backward stepwise logistic regression.
resultsDuring a median follow-up of 13.3 years, 3003 lung cancer cases were identified. We found ALP levels positively associated with lung cancer risk, whereas ALT, TBIL, ALB, and AST were inversely correlated; TP exhibited a U-shaped association, whereas GGT displayed a mirrored J-shaped relationship. These associations were amplified among smokers. MR analysis indicated that smoking behavior could increase ALP (odds ratio [OR]: 1.05) and GGT (OR: 1.15) levels while decreasing TBIL (OR: 0.92), ALB (OR: 0.92), and TP (OR: 0.96) levels. The lung cancer risk model incorporating these biomarkers in smokers demonstrated robust discrimination.
conclusionOur finding provides perspectives and evidences towards the intricate crosstalk between the hepatic and pulmonary systems, as well as the processes through which tobacco catalyzes lung carcinogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.