ArticleThe clinical teacher2025
Combining Problem-Based Learning and Team-Based Learning in a Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship: How Do Students Spend Their Self-Study Time?
Article in The clinical teacher, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of problem-based learning in EBERs-ISH theoretical and practical teaching.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-study is essential for student learning, and active learning methods aim to facilitate constructive self-study time usage. How active learning strategies actually affect student self-study in medical education, however, remains partly unknown. The aim of this study was to examine medical students' use of self-study time in a longitudinal integrated clerkship employing active learning strategies. Week-long time logs were used to collect quantitative data on students' scholastic activities. Furthermore, semistructured individual interviews were conducted for in-depth exploration of different learning activities' influence on students' self-study behaviour. Preparation for and follow-up work after scheduled learning activities were specifically addressed. Students spent on average 42.1 h per week on educational activities, of which self-study comprised 23 h. Preparation for upcoming learning activities was highly prioritized by the students. Team-based learning (TBL) generated most self-study hours, closely followed by patient encounters, while problem-based learning (PBL) induced least amounts of self-study. 50% of self-study time was done without specific relation to scheduled learning activities. Active learning methods appear to promote preparatory work, in accordance with their pedagogic theory. Type of learning activity appears to be decisive in determining the amount of self-study students choose to undertake. Future research should address how quantity and content of different learning activities influence self-study behaviour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.