ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2025
Building bridges from research outcomes to clinical practice decisions.
Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Practitioners may face difficulties implementing research results into practice. Seven examples of common knowledge translation barriers for clinicians are presented, and suggestions are offered for building effective communication bridges. Changes in how research results are reported and interpreted across different practice contexts can improve orthodontic care. These include (a) attention to the expected benefit that includes estimates of both likely clinical value and probability of occurrence, (b) cost considerations, (c) generalizability across contexts that require interpretation adjustments, (d) measures of effect size in addition to measures of statistical significance, (e) determination of the largest relative sources of variance in the reported results, (f) estimating probabilities that lead to practice actions, and (g) conversion of research descriptions to values that impact practice decisions. Examples of improved communication relevant to clinicians are provided that can be used to build stronger bridges between orthodontic research and practice. Although advances in orthodontic research rigor have been noted, journal articles would benefit from more clinician-friendly descriptions of results and their impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.