ArticleJournal of surgical education2025
Mapping the Impact of Anti-LGBT Legislation on Graduate Surgical Education.
Article in Journal of surgical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urological care for sexual and gender minorities: a narrative review toward equitable care.Current opinion in urology · 2026Review
- Experiences of LGBTQIA+ medical students: gaps and challenges during preclinical education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Educational Strategies to Support LGBTQ+ Trainees in Graduate Medical Education - A Narrative Review.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLGBTQ medical students and surgery residents face myriad structural barriers. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) reports 492 pieces of state-level legislation targeting Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ) people in the past year. These bills including bans on medical care, "don't say gay" bills, exclusion from anti-discrimination protections, and more. These bills may limit where medical students pursue surgical training STUDY
designThe Movement Advancement Project and the ACLU legislative databases were consulted to determine whether states (plus Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia) currently had or were actively considering anti-LGBTQ legislation. This information was then mapped against data from the 2023 National Residency Match Program. US News rankings of top surgical training programs were utilized as well.
resultsThere were 2803 general surgical training spots, of which 1597 (57%) were located in states which currently have anti-LGBTQ legislation in place. 245 (9%) of training spots are in states which do not have such legislation but are currently considering anti-LGBTQ legislation. Of the top 20 residency programs, 11 (55%) were in states with anti-LGBTQ legislation. In affiliated specialties, 50 (54%), 118 (57%), and 24 (49%) surgical training positions for integrated vascular, plastic, and thoracic surgery, respectively, are in states that currently have anti-LGBTQ legislation in place. In total, 63% of fellowship opportunities were in states with Anti-LGBTQ legislation in place
conclusionA majority of graduate surgical education occurs in states with anti-LGBTQ legislation, potentially limiting residency options for people who value protection of LGBTQ rights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.