Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39721021›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Convergent Patterns of Karyotype Evolution Underlying Karyotype Uniformity in Conifers.

Ren-Gang Zhang, Hui Liu, Hong-Yun Shang, Heng Shu, De-Tuan Liu, Hao Yang, Kai-Hua Jia, Xiao-Quan Wang, Wei-Bang Sun, Wei Zhao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Chromosomal evolution and speciation inferred from chromosome-scale genome assemblies in three Cupressaceae species.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Convergent Patterns of Karyotype Evolution Underlying Karyotype Uniformity in Conifers.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ren-Gang ZhangYunnan Key Laboratory for Integrative Conservation of Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations / State Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8028-9208
Hui LiuDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå Plant Science Cente, Umeå University, Umeå, SE-901 87, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1980-5952
Hong-Yun ShangYunnan Key Laboratory for Integrative Conservation of Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations / State Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6886-7810
Heng ShuYunnan Key Laboratory for Integrative Conservation of Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations / State Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China.
De-Tuan LiuYunnan Key Laboratory for Integrative Conservation of Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations / State Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2295-3799
Hao YangYunnan Key Laboratory for Integrative Conservation of Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations / State Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China.
Kai-Hua JiaInstitute of Crop Germplasm Resources, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji'nan, 250100, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8134-5830
Xiao-Quan WangState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops and Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3978-0828
Wei-Bang SunYunnan Key Laboratory for Integrative Conservation of Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations / State Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5246-9226
Wei ZhaoDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå Plant Science Cente, Umeå University, Umeå, SE-901 87, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9437-3198
Yongpeng MaYunnan Key Laboratory for Integrative Conservation of Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations / State Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7725-3677

Funding

Chinese Academy of Sciences KIBXD202401National Key Research and Development Program 2022YFF1301700Strategic Priority Research Program of Kunming Institute of BotanyTen Thousand Talent Program of Yunnan Province 202001AS070019Ten Thousand Talent Program of Yunnan Province YNWR-QNBJ-2018-174Yunnan Key Research and Development Program 202403AC100028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Karyotype diversity plays an important role in speciation and diversification. However, gymnosperms, particularly conifers, exhibit remarkable karyotype uniformity. To explore the evolutionary processes shaping karyotypes in gymnosperms, the karyotype evolutionary history is reconstructed through comparative genomic analyses. Synteny analysis confirms the absence of ancient polyploidy in conifers and its rarity across the gymnosperms as a whole. Further analysis reveals convergent patterns of reciprocal translocations between nonhomologous chromosomes in conifer genomes. Centromeric-centromeric reciprocal translocations (CRTs) have been identified as the primary mechanism of karyotype evolution in conifers, while telomeric-centromeric reciprocal translocations (TRTs) significantly contributed to descending dysploidy within Cupressales. A graph-based method is utilized to infer the detailed evolutionary pathways from the proto-gymnosperm karyotype (n = 12) to modern conifer karyotypes (n = 11-12). In conclusion, the scarcity of both polyploidy and dysploidy contributes to the karyotype uniformity of gymnosperms and potentially also to their lower species richness compared to angiosperms. However, the pervasive CRTs and occasional TRTs underlie this "apparent uniformity", supporting the "karyotype orthoselection" hypothesis. This study provides new insights into the mechanisms maintaining karyotype uniformity in conifers and the role of karyotype evolution in their diversification.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantEvolution, MolecularKaryotypeTracheophytaGenome, PlantKaryotypingPhylogenyPolyploidyconifersdescending dysploidykaryotype evolutionpolyploidyproto‐gymnosperm karyotypereciprocal translocationssynteny analysis

Identifiers

PMID39721021
PMCPMC11831501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.