ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure and Associated Factors: Insights From National Health Accounts (NHA) Using Panel Data Analysis.
Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Out-of-pocket expenditure on medicine for chronic patients and its economic impact on Indian households: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- From individual burden to social risk pooling: drivers of the declining out-of-pocket health expenditure share in China (2009-2024).International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Difference in out-of-pocket health expenditure among Syrian refugees in Jordan, Lebanon and the Kurdistan region of Iraq.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Kerala's Aardram Mission and universal health coverage: integrated time series evidence on mortality reduction and assessment of financial protection and equity gaps.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between out-of-pocket (OOP) healthcare spending, economic growth, population growth, and government health expenditure as a proportion of general government expenditure using National Health Accounts (NHA) estimates. Out-of-Pocket (OOP) healthcare spending imposes a substantial financial burden on households, especially in developing economies such as India. Understanding the factors that influence OOP payments is crucial for policymakers seeking to enhance healthcare systems and achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC). High OOP expenditures often lead to impoverishment and inequitable access to healthcare, making it a critical area for reform. Despite the well-known negative economic and social consequences of high OOP spending, there is limited research that thoroughly examines the interplay between key economic variables such as economic growth, population growth, and government healthcare expenditure (GHE) as a proportion of general government expenditure (GGE) in shaping OOP healthcare spending. Furthermore, although the National Health Accounts (NHA) offers comprehensive data across Indian states, few studies have leveraged this data to explore the dynamics of these factors. This study aims to fill this gap by providing empirical insights into how these economic and demographic elements influence OOP healthcare spending in India. The analysis employed fixed and random effects models on data from 19 Indian states spanning the years 2013-14 and 2019-20. Fixed effects models were selected based on the results of the Hausman test, which indicated that these models were more effective for controlling unobserved heterogeneity across states.The results indicate that a 1% increase in Gross State Domestic Product is associated with a 0.5% reduction in OOP payments. No significant relationship was identified between population growth or GHE/GGE ratio and OOP healthcare spending. These results imply that while economic growth can contribute to lowering healthcare costs, other factors, such as public health spending, may not be as effective unless they are more strategically targeted. The study underscores the vital role of economic growth in reducing OOP healthcare spending, especially in states facing significant financial burdens. Policymakers should consider aligning economic growth strategies with healthcare reforms to ensure that the benefits of development lead to reduced OOP expenditures. As the findings also suggest that GHE/GGE does not significantly affect OOP costs, policymakers should enhance the targeting and efficiency of public health expenditures while expanding health insurance coverage, and strengthening primary healthcare systems to mitigate OOP costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.