Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720762›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters2024

Automated surgical skill assessment in endoscopic pituitary surgery using real-time instrument tracking on a high-fidelity bench-top phantom.

Adrito Das, Bilal Sidiqi, Laurent Mennillo, Zhehua Mao, Mikael Brudfors, Miguel Xochicale, Danyal Z Khan, Nicola Newall, John G Hanrahan, Matthew J Clarkson and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Adrito DasUCL Hawkes Institute University College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5682-9545
Bilal SidiqiUCL Hawkes Institute University College London London UK.
Laurent MennilloUCL Hawkes Institute University College London London UK.
Zhehua MaoUCL Hawkes Institute University College London London UK.
Mikael BrudforsNVIDIA London UK.
Miguel XochicaleUCL Hawkes Institute University College London London UK.
Danyal Z KhanUCL Hawkes Institute University College London London UK.
Nicola NewallUCL Hawkes Institute University College London London UK.
John G HanrahanUCL Hawkes Institute University College London London UK.
Matthew J ClarksonUCL Hawkes Institute University College London London UK.
Danail StoyanovUCL Hawkes Institute University College London London UK.
Hani J MarcusUCL Hawkes Institute University College London London UK.
Sophia BanoUCL Hawkes Institute University College London London UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved surgical skill is generally associated with improved patient outcomes, although assessment is subjective, labour intensive, and requires domain-specific expertise. Automated data-driven metrics can alleviate these difficulties, as demonstrated by existing machine learning instrument tracking models. However, these models are tested on limited datasets of laparoscopic surgery, with a focus on isolated tasks and robotic surgery. Here, a new public dataset is introduced: the nasal phase of simulated endoscopic pituitary surgery. Simulated surgery allows for a realistic yet repeatable environment, meaning the insights gained from automated assessment can be used by novice surgeons to hone their skills on the simulator before moving to real surgery. Pituitary Real-time INstrument Tracking Network (PRINTNet) has been created as a baseline model for this automated assessment. Consisting of DeepLabV3 for classification and segmentation, StrongSORT for tracking, and the NVIDIA Holoscan for real-time performance, PRINTNet achieved 71.9% multiple object tracking precision running at 22 frames per second. Using this tracking output, a multilayer perceptron achieved 87% accuracy in predicting surgical skill level (novice or expert), with the 'ratio of total procedure time to instrument visible time' correlated with higher surgical skill. The new publicly available dataset can be found at https://doi.org/10.5522/04/26511049.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceinstrument segmentationmachine learningminimally invasive surgeryneurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID39720762
PMCPMC11665785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.