ArticleHealthcare technology letters2024
Automated surgical skill assessment in endoscopic pituitary surgery using real-time instrument tracking on a high-fidelity bench-top phantom.
Article in Healthcare technology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in pituitary surgery: the path to clinical solutions.Endocrine-related cancer · 2026Review
- ConsisTNet: a spatio-temporal approach for consistent anatomical localization in endoscopic pituitary surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Identifying research priorities for pituitary adenoma surgery: an international Delphi consensus statement.Pituitary · 2025Article
- Automated surgical skill assessment in endoscopic pituitary surgery using real-time instrument tracking on a high-fidelity bench-top phantom.Healthcare technology letters · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Improved surgical skill is generally associated with improved patient outcomes, although assessment is subjective, labour intensive, and requires domain-specific expertise. Automated data-driven metrics can alleviate these difficulties, as demonstrated by existing machine learning instrument tracking models. However, these models are tested on limited datasets of laparoscopic surgery, with a focus on isolated tasks and robotic surgery. Here, a new public dataset is introduced: the nasal phase of simulated endoscopic pituitary surgery. Simulated surgery allows for a realistic yet repeatable environment, meaning the insights gained from automated assessment can be used by novice surgeons to hone their skills on the simulator before moving to real surgery. Pituitary Real-time INstrument Tracking Network (PRINTNet) has been created as a baseline model for this automated assessment. Consisting of DeepLabV3 for classification and segmentation, StrongSORT for tracking, and the NVIDIA Holoscan for real-time performance, PRINTNet achieved 71.9% multiple object tracking precision running at 22 frames per second. Using this tracking output, a multilayer perceptron achieved 87% accuracy in predicting surgical skill level (novice or expert), with the 'ratio of total procedure time to instrument visible time' correlated with higher surgical skill. The new publicly available dataset can be found at https://doi.org/10.5522/04/26511049.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.